This is a continually perplexing question for us, and one which probably has several answers. First, we think many sellers don’t realize that commissions are not fixed. The big real estate companies spend a lot of effort training their agents to focus on the service-side of their pitch and not on their fees. To support their rigid pricing structure, many agents will argue that if you pay less, you will get less. Its all a smokescreen, of course. There is no shortage of unhappy sellers who paid 6%. Loyalty is another reason, as sellers will often return to the agents who helped them buy their house initially. And although we certainly cherish the same long-term relationship with our former clients, we continue to work towards having sellers take a closer look at a comparable service that will cost thousands of dollars less.
Brett Weinstein
In the SF Chronicle column known as “Surreal Estate”, on 7/22/07(http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2007/07/20/carollloyd.DTL)
the author, Carol Lloyd, asked the very important question: “But can’t there be a happy medium between high-commission professionals and bootstrap DIY?”
Then she cites:
“Next week: Red Fin, FSBO.com, and Help U Sell: The changing terrain of minimum service agents and customer rebates.”
The happy medium she seeks is NOT The Redfin, FSBO.com or Help U Sell models. These require a great deal of involvement from the seller (i.e. holding their own open houses), or in Help U Sell’s case, only saving a seller money if the property stays off the MLS, thus greatly limiting its exposure. If paying a traditional realtor 6% is one extreme, then these models are only a step above the other extreme, total do-it-yourself.
The true middle ground is offered by a company such as mine: Realty Advocates. Based in Oakland, but servicing most of the East Bay and San Francisco, we offer a genuine middle ground between the 6%ers and the DIY. We provide the highest degree of service and professionalism while simply charging less in commissions (typically 3.5%-4.5%) Ours is a 21 year track record of success.
Brett Weinstein
“Homeowners Can Be Fooled”
Says S.F. Chronicle Columnist
Arthur M. Louis, author of the San Francisco Chronicle’s “Moneybag” Q&A in its Business Section, has run some wonderfully provocative commentary lately about real estate commissions. He sure is no fan of the traditional 6% commission!
In columns printed March 3, March 18 and April 1, 2007, one agent writes to complain that Realtors aren’t compensated enough, given that its costs so much to market a house. Another writes that he considers its offensive that Louis “completely underestimates the level of expertise required to be a good Realtor.” And lastly, an unnamed agent claims that his self-interest in earning the highest possible commission would require him to steer clients away from otherwise desirable houses if it offered a lower commission. Louis’s response to this last complainer summarizes them all: “Are you trying to convince me that all those dreadful stereotypes of real estate agents are based on fact?”
As a full service Realtor charging untraditional commissions for over 20 years, I am in full alignment with Louis’s assessments. The problem that Louis points out, and has been documented in several research studies, is that the 6% commission is designed to compensate an agent for the all the time and money spent he/she spends in activities other than the actual job of helping a person buy or sell. Activities like farming, brand advertising, referral fees, and image marketing with fancy offices and luxury cars. Does a nationally airing TV commercial of a generic agent standing in front of a generic house mean that “Joe” seller in Berkeley will get the highest possible price for his house? Why should a seller pay 6% just to support a relo service that requires the buyer’s agent to pay 30% of her commission as a referral fee?
Among agents, it is considered heresy to point out that for the work and expertise we actually utilize to sell a house, or help a buyer purchase one, we are OVERPAID. This dovetails with what Louis says: “many full-commissions real estate agents seem to assume that the world owes them a living.” And clearly, despite many new business models to emerge because of the Internet, “Homeowners can be fooled–witness the fact that many of them still pay 6% commissions.”
Louis offers his own “modest proposal”: “slash the standard commission to 1% and let 5/6 of the agents find other work. The remaining agents will be adequately compensated and home sellers will get a better deal.” No objection here.
